Come certamente avrete letto, Enzo40, capogruppo PD, ha fatto un’interrogazione al sindaco su una questione denunciata da u Zanzn: la cattedrale Consiat .
Enzo40 , che proprio su questo blog aveva preso l’impegno di curare da vicino questa questione, aveva inviato anche a me, per email il testo dell’interrogazione, e io, pensando che me l’avesse inviata in esclusiva, essendo la Consiat una questione di questo blog, mi ero riservato di pubblicarla nei prossimi giorni dal momento che oggi ci erano stati già altri comunicati e non avrebbe avuto l’attenzione dovuta.
Poi l’interrogazione è cmq uscita e allora la riprendo anche io con i miei commenti.
Enzo40, nella sua interrogazione dice: dal momento che dal 1998 il comune ha aderito alla convenzione con la Consiat; che in virtù di tale convenzione è stato realizzato a Torremaggiore un centro e una struttura per l’agricoltura, “ Che per tale lotto il Comune non ha incassato alcuna somma , avendo ottenuto in cambio quote del capitale Social Consiat for the amount due by him for the purchase of land; What the management center for agriculture, albeit made, so far does not seem to have fulfilled its mission and do not see benefits this project ; That by resolution of the City Council no. 41 of 08.09.2007 has been terminated the previous agreement between the City and Consiat and approved the new framework agreement between the two institutions, again in order to manage the industrial and manufacturing area; What since 1998 are not to the undersigned that the Consiat has obtained funding for the artisanal and industrial area and that the only funding obtained for the infrastructure projects are derived from the municipality itself ;
Given all this, our Enzo40 calls to the Mayor " what are the obligations that it intends to take against the Consiat, since so far no benefit to the 'Body it is from these agreements and there were charges against the Commune .
My considerations:
1 - First I want to respond to suspected supporters of the Democratic Party who accuse the opposition of being Enzo40 doing this query: this is a sign of ignorance, is ignorance. The question of Enzo40 wants to bring in the light of an objective problem in which the City has in the past we put money, a resource to fend for themselves. Some objections to me the most from one of the PDL and the PD, but then piddino rhymes with pidiellino.
2 - from interrogation shows that the City Council of the shares in an empty box and that does not work.
3 - My proposal is to disengage from Consiat, as defined by Article. 7 of the Convention, as the same Enzo40 points out: " art. 7 of the revised framework of the Convention provides for a term of ten years, but provides that if the Consiat unable to do so to begin the procedures for allocation of lots, the Convention is to answer "and" today than three years have passed since the adoption of this act and recommend any allocation procedure is put into lots be. " Sganga from Consiat could give this beautiful property or any company that works to make a contest among young entrepreneurs and serious (possibly in agriculture).
4 - I ask Enzo40 to make public the response of the mayor, because these written responses will not understand anything.
0 comments:
Post a Comment